Assortative Matching with Large Firms∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
Technological progress allows firms to scale production processes over an increasingly large number of workers. This affects the size of the firm as well as the skill level of its workforce. We propose a unifying theory of production where management resolves a tradeoff between hiring more versus better workers. The span of control or size is therefore intimately intertwined with the sorting pattern. We provide a condition for sorting that captures this tradeoff between the quantity and quality of workers and that generalizes Becker’s sorting condition. A system of differential equations determines the equilibrium allocation, the firm size and wages. We illustrate the theory using German matched employer data, and apply it to analyze quantity-biased technological change in conjunction with skill-biased technological change. We find that quantity-biased technological change is sizable and important. Moreover, it partially dampens the skill-premium, which would have increased even more. Skill-biased technological change is therefore even larger than the increase in the skill premium indicates.
منابع مشابه
An Empirical Assessment of Assortative Matching in the Labor Market
In labor markets with worker and firm heterogeneity, the matching between firms and workers may be assortative, meaning that the most productive workers and firms team up. We investigate this with longitudinal population-wide matched employer-employee data from Portugal. Using dynamic panel data methods, we quantify a firm-specific productivity term for each firm, and we relate this to the skil...
متن کاملBetter Workers Move to Better Firms: A Simple Test to Identify Sorting
Better Workers Move to Better Firms: A Simple Test to Identify Sorting We propose a simple test that uses information on workers’ mobility, wages and firms’ profits to identify the sign and strength of assortative matching. The basic intuition underlying our empirical strategy is that, in the presence of positive (negative) assortative matching, good workers are more (less) likely to move to be...
متن کاملIdentifying Sorting in Practice,∗
Eeckhout and Kircher (2009) argue that using wage data alone, it is virtually impossible to identify whether assortative matching between worker and firm types is positive or negative. This paper proposes to use workers mobility to identify the sign assortative matching. In order to understand the nature of sorting, we directly analyze the matching process between firms and workers. In the abse...
متن کاملEndogenous Matching in University- Industry Collaboration: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the UK
We develop a two-sided matching model to analyze collaboration between heterogeneous academics and firms. We predict a positive assortative matching in terms of both scientific ability and affinity for type of research, but negative assortative in terms of ability on one side and affinity in the other. In addition, the most able and most applied academics and the most able and most basic firms ...
متن کاملMatching information
We analyze the allocation of heterogeneous experts to teams of fixed size. Experts differ in the precision of their information about an unknown state and make a joint decision, aggregating their potentially correlated information. In this setting, we study the assortative matching properties (Becker (1973)) of teams. The main insight is that in most cases, the optimal matching contains no team...
متن کاملTeam Formation in Firms: Matching with Search and Separation
We adopt dynamic matching theory to model team formation in organizations. Workers and managers are heterogenous in quality and select each other in order to form teams. Searching for a teammate is costly. Our primary theoretical innovation is to allow agents to search while matched and separate if they find a better teammate. If one side of the market has the ability to separate, we achieve po...
متن کامل